**Scientific Debate Intensifies Over the Nature of Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS**
The interstellar object 3I/ATLAS has become the center of a heated debate within the scientific community. Harvard physicist Avi Loeb has openly accused the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) of overlooking compelling evidence that may suggest the object is artificial in origin.
### Conflicting Views on the True Nature of 3I/ATLAS
NASA maintains that 3I/ATLAS is a natural comet, basing their assessment on spectral analysis and the presence of a coma—a cloud of gas and dust typical of comets entering the Solar System. According to the agency, the object’s overall structure aligns with that of a small icy body. However, Loeb challenges this classification, pointing to several anomalies that he believes warrant a more rigorous investigation.
Loeb highlights features such as the object’s retrograde orbit and its trajectory, which aligns closely with the plane of the Solar System—a pattern some researchers argue is unlikely for a body originating randomly from interstellar space. Most notably, he has identified a rhythmic, pulsed luminosity variation that he describes as a “heartbeat” signal.
In Loeb’s view, this regular pulsing could suggest artificial activity, possibly indicating operational mechanisms of an advanced spacecraft. “The pulses might represent periodic thrusts for trajectory adjustments or an internal operational cycle within the object,” Loeb explained. In astrobiology and the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI), such periodic signals are often considered potential technosignatures, distinctly different from the chaotic tumbling typically seen in natural asteroids.
### The Jupiter Rendezvous and Call for Scientific Transparency
Loeb further criticizes NASA for prematurely labeling 3I/ATLAS as a mere comet and dismissing anomalies without comprehensive analysis. He asserts that this approach violates the principle of scientific independence. To address the unknowns, he has called for the release of unedited raw data and the allocation of resources to monitor the object’s anticipated close approach to Jupiter in March 2026.
This upcoming encounter is viewed as critical. Should 3I/ATLAS perform any non-gravitational maneuvers within Jupiter’s Hill sphere—the region dominated by the giant planet’s gravity—it could serve as irrefutable evidence of intelligent control.
“Even if this explanation turns out to be wrong, we must take it seriously because of its huge implications to society,” Loeb wrote in a post on Medium. “Admitting that there are mysterious facts about 3I/ATLAS endows us with the curiosity to learn something new. Excluding the anomalies from NASA’s vocabulary alienates the public, because it violates the scientific declaration of independence. The proper way to address alternative interpretations of 3I/ATLAS is by explaining anomalies away, not by ignoring them.”
### NASA Reaffirms Natural Origin
Despite the controversy and pressure from scientific observers like Loeb, NASA remains steadfast in its conclusion that 3I/ATLAS is a natural interstellar comet. The agency points to their observational data showing the object’s comet-like behavior, including the presence of a coma and gas emissions consistent with known cometary activity.
While acknowledging that the object exhibits some unusual characteristics, NASA officials emphasize that none of these anomalies currently provide credible evidence of an artificial or extraterrestrial origin.
—
As the scientific community awaits the critical Jupiter flyby in 2026, the debate over 3I/ATLAS highlights the broader challenge of distinguishing natural cosmic phenomena from potential technosignatures—and underscores the importance of transparency and open inquiry in advancing our understanding of the universe.
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/3i-atlas-nasa-calls-it-comet-harvard-scientist-avi-loeb-suggests-alien-technology-heres-why-1759537
